Over the last few years we have seen some freedom camps Australia Wide close :
The Fifth Wheelers Network Inc has appointed Frans
Hamer to put the travelling publics point of view and to correct some untruths that have been submitted to some government departments
over the last few years.
This page will be used in future to relay Frans Hamers work in this area. We recommend that you visit this
page from time to time for any updates.
His first submission on behalf of the Fifth Wheelers Network Inc in reply to the Directions
Paper – Review of Council Recreational Vehicle Overnight Camping Services in Tasmania.
Review of Council Recreational Vehicle Overnight Camping Services -
The Fifth Wheeler Network has carefully considered
the Directions Paper – Review of Council Recreational Vehicle Overnight Camping Services which requires that Councils charge fees
for the camping grounds which are currently provided free of charge or at minimal cost.
The FWN strongly disagrees with the direction
of the Review as not being in
Our Conclusions
to our investigations and the recommendations to the Minister are shown below and the full submission can be downloaded from:
CONCLUSIONS
- RESULTS OF RESEARCH
The result of the independent research has led the Fifth Wheelers Network (FWN) to the conclusion that there
has been significant errors made.
The decision by the Office of the Tasmanian Economic Regulator to declare the provision of the free
camps in question as “in breach of competitive neutrality principles under National Competition Policy”:
1. is completely
out of step with the decisions of other states;
2. appears to be in breach of The Economic Regular Act 2009;
3. does not appear to conform with the Tasmanian Government Policy “Significant Business Activities and Local Government in
4. does not fully take into account the affected market;
5. does not take into account
the travel patterns of RV travellers;
6. will substantially increase the cost of visiting
7. will not increase the turnover of the caravan parks making the complaints, while, at the
same time…
8. …is not in the best interest of the businesses in the towns involved, and;
9. will
reduce the number of visitors to
10. will damage the Tasmanian economy in the
order of up to $40 million per year for the questionable benefit to only a handful of caravan parks.
RECOMMENDATION
The findings can
lead to only one principal recommendation.
It is recommended that following the receipt of all comments and submissions to the Directions
Paper, the Minister requests the Regulator to review the Regulator’s decision. The review should take into account the
contents of all the submissions and new information including the apparent anomalies in making the decision, listed below in this
submission. The Regulator then issues a report to the Minister accordingly.
Should the Regulator not reverse the decision, then
on receipt of that report, the Minister should, under Section 59 of the Economic Regulator Act provide the Regulator and the Complainant
written notice that the Minister intends taking no action on the complaint.
Alternatively, the Minister should advise the Complainant,
the four Councils and the Regulator that based on further information received during this public consultation period, he will reverse
his previous decision under Section 59 of the Economic Regulator Act and will now take no further action on the complaint.
To do otherwise
is against the best interests of the Tasmanian economy, will have a significant adverse effect on numerous small businesses directly
affected, and risks causing a substantial downturn in Tasmania’s CCM traveller market, compounding the already reduced preferences
of Tasmania as a destination.